|
School
indoor air quality
Take Action!
Clearing
Up Air Quality Problems at Schools
Much of
the indoor air quality problem at schools is related to the need for
repairs that schools cannot afford. Faced with the need to buy books, pay
teachers and fund other critical education-related issues, improving air
quality often ends up at the bottom of the funding priorities.
The
federal government could help, but has traditionally veered away from
providing any sort of financial support to school construction, insisting
that such matters are a state and local funding concern. Below are some
updates on issues in Washington, D.C. that could help schools out, and
what you can do to help.
Education
Legislation Includes Environmental Measures…But Doesn’t Go Far Enough
Included
in the education appropriations bill passed by the U.S. Congress in
December 2001 were elements that address environmental concerns.
Specifically, the legislators incorporated some provisions of bills that
had been sponsored by Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Robert
G. Toricelli (D-N.J.).
The
measures include several elements that address school-related
environmental concerns, such as provisions to study characteristics of
school environments that could be unhealthy. Researchers will examine how
such factors as poor indoor air quality, inappropriate use of chemicals,
lead-based paint, and contaminated water might adversely impact student
achievement, student concentration, student behavior and other
education-related effects.
This will
go a long way toward helping to quantify risks of environmental problems
in schools, including indoor air pollution. However, there is one catch.
The
federal government did not make provisions to help schools fix such
problems.
Instead,
legislators created a grant program to fund such issues as analyzing
building strategies, designs, materials and equipment—as well as to
conduct research and obtain technical assistance. While this might sound
promising, there is still a catch.
Congress
didn’t dedicate any funds to the grant program. Instead, they left
funding up to the discretion of the Secretary of Education.
Implementing
this grant program would be an important first step—so that we can begin
working on the next steps. Please contact Rod Paige, Secretary of
Education, to urge him to implement the environmental health study and
to allocate $50 million a year for the grant program. He can be
reached at the U.S. Department of Education; 400 Maryland Avenue, SW;
Building FOB-6; Room 7W301; Washington, DC 20202 or via e-mail at
Rod.Paige@ed.gov.
Below is
a sample letter to help get you started:
Dear
Secretary Paige:
Please
don’t let indoor air quality at schools be ignored. Toxins in
classrooms, cafeterias and elsewhere are creating more cases of kids with
asthma—a staggering 4.8 million so far. These same indoor air pollutants
are worsening the health of children who already have asthma.
In the
recent Education Appropriations Bill, Congress acknowledged this by
authorizing a study on healthy school environments and establishing a
grant program to assist school districts in their efforts to make schools
environmentally healthy places to learn and work. I urge you to make
funding for this program a high priority and allocate $2 million for the
study and $50 million for school districts.
Sincerely,
[Your
Name]
Building
Up Building Funds
With
regard to federal aid for actual school repairs, help may come from a
different legislative action.
In April
2002, Senators Jean Carnahan (D-MO), Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) and Tom
Harkin (D-IA) introduced legislation to address the lack of federal
support for school construction (and the fact that schools don’t have
many options to generate financing for such work). Like a House bill
introduced last year by Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-CA), the bill calls for
capitalizing State Infrastructure Banks (SIBs). These SIBs would help
schools with construction and repairs while maintaining state and local
flexibility and responsibility. This would be a middle ground for
legislators who are opposed to any federal role and others who want
federal tax credits for school bonds. Futhermore, the SIBs would
eventually become self-sufficient “revolving loan funds,” so in
essence they will pay for themselves.
Find out
if your legislators support this legislative action. If they do, encourage
them to continue their support. If they don’t already support it, let
them know how important the issue is to you. To keep tabs on the progress
of this (or any other) legislation, visit the government Web site
“Thomas: Legislative Information on the Internet.” To reach that
site’s search page, click
here.
|